That's not what they're doing. This was using one of those generative ai hallucination tools that "add detail" to a video to make it look fancier. Something like that clearly has no place in a courtroom.
Silly comparison. The article clearly states that Topaz Labs’ tool was used. That tool is known for being quite good but also it does still hallucinate in small portions of the images sometimes.
Photography contests, for example, clearly exclude Topaz Labs-style gen-AI enhancements from entering.