|
|
|
|
|
by lolinder
812 days ago
|
|
There's a good rundown of many relevant cases in different US jurisdictions here [0]. It looks like up through the date of publication courts were pretty consistent in ruling that digitally enhanced images may be admissible if it can be shown that they are accurate replicas of an original and the enhancement was only used to make things that were already in the image more clear. In the case of AI I do think that that will be harder to prove, because there's no specific algorithm that you're following that can be shown to be unable to introduce misleading artifacts. [0] https://www.jonathanhak.com/2018/02/17/image-clarification-n... |
|