Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jvanderbot 813 days ago
This all strikes me as a nice opening to an apocalypse movie. Pulling CO2 and upgrading to methane - wouldn't that amplify GHG effects?
2 comments

Methane has a short half-life in the atmosphere, so its cumulative effect after a few decades is close to CO2 unless you're constantly outputting more, and that's assuming you're not burning it.

In the case where you're making methane from atmospheric CO2 and then burning it, it's just returning the same CO2 back, which per the article is carbon neutral.

More like a few centuries, methane's global warming potential after 500 years (GWP-500) is still 7.95.

The issue with burning is that methane can leak during transport.

I stand corrected: did the maths wrong. Centuries it is.
There's a big difference in scale between "burning hydrocarbons to heat and power much of the world" (which includes leakage from fossil fuel drilling) and "we make some methane to be almost completely consumed and there are some leaks".