[Gormo]

> Name a company that is legal to run that SHOULD have it's owner's identity hidden...

Every single one of them. If you don't want to do business with a firm that's evasive about its ownership, that's your prerogative, but forcing anyone engaged in business to have sensitive personal information about them recorded in a centralized database that will be a beacon for corruption and abuse is invasive, anti-social, and dangerous.

> Only those that dwell in darkness fear the light.

You are of course welcome to post your full name, home address, phone number, social security number, annual income itemized by source, credit score, and any other personal information you feel should be exposed to "light" right here in this thread.

[MC68328]

My credit score is 850. What now?

It's funny that every bit of that information is demanded by employers, and they usually don't reciprocate. It's only considered "sensitive" information because our society is incompetent and corrupt. The secrecy that protects the rich and powerful is an artifact of that corruption. In a just and competent society, none of that information could be used against us, because we wouldn't be using identifiers as secret keys, and harassers could be identified and punished.

If you have to hide to feel free, you're not actually free.

[Gormo]

> My credit score is 850. What now?

Name, address, phone, SSN, credit card numbers, tax returns, itemized income statement, health records, SMS logs, phone logs, email account exports, relationship history.

> It's only considered "sensitive" information because our society is incompetent and corrupt.

"Society" is an abstract concept, and the concrete reality that it represents is a large collection of people who are mostly strangers to you, and whose interests and values are by no means guaranteed to align with yours even when they are totally honest.

> The secrecy that protects the rich and powerful is an artifact of that corruption.

The same secrecy protects you and me. And at the end of the day, I don't care one bit about "the rich", and "the powerful" are exactly who I want safeguards against.

> In a just and competent society

...the streets would be paved with gold, champagne would flow from the taps, we'd all live to be a thousand, and our pets would speak to us in perfect English.

> none of that information could be used against us

You are of course free to use HTTP instead of HTTPS for all of your web-based data transmission.

> If you have to hide to feel free, you're not actually free.

I think I'll stick with imperfect freedom in this reality over perfect freedom in a nonexistent one.