Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sophacles 812 days ago
You're comparing apples and oranges here....

A $25/TB drive is not the only expense that $5 goes towards:

* there's actually probably 2 or more HDs holding that TB, since the business is promising that the data won't be lost

* theres the computer(s) that hold that HD.

* theres the electicity, bandwidth and space rental costs for those computers

* theres the cost of employees to make sure that the computers keep running.

* theres the cost of the marketing so that you know that the service is available

* theres all the book-keeping, taxes, cc fees, etc that need to be paid on the recurring charge

* there's (hopefully) profit for the investors/owners

and so on.

Also, on your side you should consider several of those factors yourself to do the comparrison:

* how much do you consider the time spent managing your hdds to be worth? (if you're a business this is employee-hrs, if you're talking about for yourself privately, there's still a value you should attach to your own time)

* do you have backups? If so, what does it cost to put them offsite? (In terms of space rental or favors traded, and your time)

* electricity, etc

* how much is it going to cost you to learn to reliably store your data (in terms of up-front cost, time spent, etc)

* and of course hard drive costs

1 comments

I am aware they are hosted on servers with mirrors or parity drives. It still makes no sense how these services seem to raise prices over time instead of seeing the savings from depreciating storage and hardware costs passed to the consumer, unless you realize they are squeezing you.