I'm more interested in who donated to the George Wallace campaign.
And frankly, if revealing that sort of information to the public means less donations, I'm pretty fine with that as an outcome. The fact is, corporations can buy politicians/judges and that's a way bigger issue than the privacy of millionaires.
> For instance, who donated to NAACP during the civil rights era right?
Those individuals should not be a matter of public interest - yes. Was there a different point you are trying to make?