|
|
|
|
|
by ethbr1
809 days ago
|
|
> just... building homes A component of this is minimum building standards. Homeless is a direct consequence of socially deciding that no new housing under certain standards (and therefore building costs) can be constructed. If we were okay with building cost- and density-optimized cubes, we could probably solve homelessness in a year. Instead, we've decided that it's better to have minimum building standards, with the side effect that some people cannot afford such a dwelling. |
|
Just mindlessly chasing "newer code is better", without understanding how it affects housing affordability. Or maybe it's an intentional payout to developers to let them profit from increased complexity?