Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by madeofpalk 814 days ago
Orders of magnitude more than existing barcodes which are practically free due to being printed on the packaging. A 10c RFID tag would be 10% of the cost of many products, which im sure is unacceptable to grocery stores which I can't imagine have great margins.
2 comments
manquer 814 days ago
The wages of the scanning staff is a cost to be considered on the side .

At even 10c a tag , it is equivalent to one person scanning 200 items a hour (assuming $20/hour wages) .

Factoring in time to bag and do a cash/card/coupon transaction etc a retail employee is not doing more than 500 or maybe 1000 items a hour .

A cost of 2c is definitely close to economic feasibility if 10c is not

link
clintonb 814 days ago
Retail employees do more than checkout. You’ll still need them to stock, do customer support, clean, and more.
link
manquer 813 days ago
I obviously didn’t mean all employees ,only the employees who are doing the check out .

I am not saying RFID will eliminate employees in retail , just that there is cost to not having RFID too, we should only see the diff as the cost of the tech not absolute numbers

link
clintonb 813 days ago
I understand, and what I am saying is that it is rare to have retail employees that _only_ do checkout. Nearly everyone performs multiple roles. Eliminating checkout will reduce the overall workload, but won't necessarily reduce headcount, or enough headcount to offset the cost of RFID tags.
link
Dylan16807 813 days ago
> it is rare to have retail employees that _only_ do checkout

Why is that relevant?

If 5 employees spend 20% of their combined time on checkout, and you get rid of checkout, you can go down to 4 employees, can't you? Why does the exact distribution matter? You'll still have a healthy variety of tasks to spread among those employees.

link
filoleg 814 days ago
> A 10c RFID tag would be 10% of the cost of many products, which im sure is unacceptable to grocery stores which I can't imagine have great margins.

If the store decides to eat the cost of those? Sure, I can buy that logic.

However, I don't see stores being unable to just raise the price of items by 10c without much pushback, which would eliminate that issue with the profit margin entirely (since the cost of it is offloaded to the customer).

I, personally, would love to be able to pay just 10c extra per item, if it meant that I can have a checkout experience similar to that of Uniqlo.

link