Do not touch unless you understand how the license works and want to do so anyway.
It would be great if the license was used more. I'd much rather contribute to something where sharealike extends in some way across networks - software doesn't link in binaries, as the GPL does cover, as much these days.
You can in fact have GPL bw applied over network IPC even
Which is the license that you think it's safe to touch when you don't understand how it works?
In what ways exactly it is more dangerous than other open source licenses in this case?
only if you intend to produce a derivative work for which you intend to sell, and thus do not want to reveal said derivative to others.
AGPL is the best license available for open source imho.
It would be great if the license was used more. I'd much rather contribute to something where sharealike extends in some way across networks - software doesn't link in binaries, as the GPL does cover, as much these days.