[icegreentea2]

The think OP means interoperable and integrated within their garden/product offerings.

[snoopsnopp]

What do you mean by that? I don’t understand.

[quickslowdown]

Teams and Office and SharePoint and Loop are all Microsoft products. They're all integrated tightly with Teams.

That's what they mean by interoperability within the walled garden of Microsoft products.

[kohbo]

Sorry but creating a meeting in teams is almost completely disjointed from the equivalent process on Outlook. Half of the features are missing on the Teams side. I can't even see other people's calendar or add people from my contact list outside of the org. It's terribly integrated.

[frumper]

I think that's your organizations settings. I have virtually the same process to make a meeting in Teams as I do in Outlook. Both are easy. I can definitely add anyone from my contact list, including those outside of my org.

[quickslowdown]

I wasn't commenting on the quality of these integrations. They're shit and I know it. Just pointing out that integration does mean something here

[benfortuna]

And those integrations would be perhaps less shit if they had competition showing them how to/incentivizing them to do it better.