|
|
|
|
|
by Klonoar
810 days ago
|
|
This is one of those points where you need to link to some kind of data or conclusive result actually showcasing this, because you're arguing against a pattern that's been in browser ecosystems for decades. I've done this for larger applications and haven't experienced issues. Being charitable, the best I can imagine right now that'd cause memory leaks is someone running into the old school JS scoping issues and capturing something in handlers that they shouldn't. That's not the handler itself that's the problem, though - that's the developer. (Yes, we could rant on and on about the poor design decisions that JS has built in, but that's been beaten to death) |
|