Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by leiferik 811 days ago
HTMX powers the UI for my AI transcription product TurboScribe (https://turboscribe.ai). Dynamic UIs that change without a page refresh, lazy loading, multi-step forms/flows, etc. It's working GREAT.

My general take on HTMX is:

1) You need to have your act together on your server. Because HTMX pushes more onto your backend, you need to know what you're doing back there (with whatever tech stack you happen to be using).

I have a friend who teaches at a coding boot camp and they do not teach students about server-rendered HTML at all. Folks coming from this world are going to have a tougher time ramping up on something like HTMX.

2) HTMX is great for the 90%+ of common UI paradigms shared by most apps (form submissions, validation, error messages, partial page reloads, lazy loading, CRUD UIs, etc).

If you have a key, critical experience that demands highly dynamic or novel interactivity, you're going to find yourself reaching to either (a) extend HTMX, or (b) create an island powered by raw JS, React, etc.

--

I love HTMX. It's a fantastic tool for delivering quality product (often with much lower engineering cost).