[turboponyy]

> They’re advocating deploying a binary as preferable to using docker, fair enough, but what about the host running the binary? One of the reasons for using containers is to wrap your security hardening into your deployment so that anytime you do need to scale out you have confidence your security settings are identical across nodes.

There are tools that make "bare metal" configuration reproducible (to varying degrees), e.g. NixOS, Ansible, building Amazon AMI images.

[headmelted]

All of which would be better than what the post is advocating and I totally agree with this.