|
|
|
|
|
by scarface_74
807 days ago
|
|
Well first that ruling was sunsetted three years for all the reasons I cited and was never a “law” binding new companies. So now you want unelected judges to decide what can and can’t be streamed on the internet. This is also not the 1930s. In 2024, movie distribution is not limited to physical meets theaters. Your citation gets trotted out all of the time in these arguments like anyone in 2024 can’t put a video on a website and distribute it anywhere in the world. When the ruling was in effect, home video media didn’t even exist and even television was in its infancy. And you still haven’t answered the question, do you also stop foreign companies from distributing thier own content ? And there is always judge shopping, liberal judges would love to stop Fox News from distributing their own content on the internet as would conservative judges love to stop media owned by “woke” corporations |
|
It's about scale, if you didn't read my first message then that's fine but just so you can ignore it again.
Me spilling 1 oz oil in my front yard is different that BP spilling millions of gallons.
Similarly Apple and Netflix teaming up is different than me and my local theater teaming up. If you don't like anti trust that's fine but don't act like it's impossible to understand.