|
|
|
|
|
by slily
805 days ago
|
|
So because climate is hard to model, it's unfair to expect models to be reliable, so we shouldn't criticize environmental doomsayers spreading bullshit projections that guide government policies before getting inevitably retracted when they are proven wrong again and again? Am I reading that right? |
|
You can't call it a joke, if models are continually improving and making steadily more accurate predictions and the accuracy is quantifiable.
You are just making the same error in opposite direction.
Lets ignore any results because it is just so complicated it can't possibly be correct.