|
|
|
|
|
|
by zeeg
816 days ago
|
|
|
Its literally described as open source all over. https://www.databricks.com/blog/announcing-dbrx-new-standard... Its even implied in comparisons everywhere: > Figure 1: DBRX outperforms established open source models on language understanding (MMLU), Programming (HumanEval), and Math (GSM8K). > The aforementioned three reasons lead us to believe that open source LLMs will continue gaining momentum. In particular, we think they provide an exciting opportunity for organizations to customize open source LLMs that can become their IP, which they use to be competitive in their industry. Just search "open source". |
|
|
https://www.databricks.com/blog/introducing-dbrx-new-state-a...
The only mention of open source is:
> DBRX outperforms established open source models
https://www.databricks.com/blog/announcing-dbrx-new-standard...
Open source is mentioned 10+ times
> Databricks is the only end-to-end platform to build high quality AI applications, and the release today of DBRX, the highest quality open source model to date, is an expression of that capability
https://github.com/databricks/dbrx
On Github it's described as an open license, not an open source license:
> DBRX is a large language model trained by Databricks, and made available under an open license.