[dotinvoke]

Thank you for checking it out!

That is not the intended behaviour, but happens sometimes when the NLP pipeline and the dictionary don’t agree on the part-of-speech of a particular word.

I’ll have to run a script identifying all such cases in the built-in decks and most likely correct them by hand.

Happy to hear any other thoughts or issues so I can make it better :)

[mft_]

(Obviously) I don't fully understand your architechure, but isn't there a (relatively) simple check that it shouldn't test for a word that it has never taught?

(And on the bright side, I'm sure I'll remember unserem now!)

[dotinvoke]

Well, yes, but the system filters definitions based on part of speech. For example, you don't want to show "to guide or conduct" (lead, verb) for a sentence talking about the metal lead (lead, noun).

In this case, unserem was assigned the part of speech determiner by the NLP pipeline (shoutout to https://stanfordnlp.github.io/stanza/, it's brilliant), but the dictionary only has an entry for unserem as a pronoun.

Perhaps a better design is to always show all entries, and just put the entries whose POS match the word in the sentence (if any) above the others.