Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dekhn 810 days ago
There is also a very simple and straightforward chip that will convert quadrature to pulses. Ls7183n. It's kind of unnecessary if you can write your own interrupt handlers but it's useful if you're just working with discrete electronics
1 comments
HeyLaughingBoy 810 days ago
The LSI-Logic encoder interface chips are nice if your encoders are running at thousands of RPM. You also have to jump though a few more hoops than just an online order (I use an LSI device in a machine tool reconditioning product), so it's not particularly hobbyist-friendly. I'd be hard pressed to imagine anyone using them if they didn't absolutely have to.

That said, they work very well.

link
dekhn 810 days ago
Huh... I'm a hobbyist and I got them at digikey for about $5/chip. It ships in a couple weeks directly from LSI. My personal goal was to eliminate one microcontroller from my project. I would probably not use one in the future as long as my project had even a basic microcontroller.
link
HeyLaughingBoy 810 days ago
Well, that's a surprise!

I just checked and the LSI7366R (the version I use) is now available through Digi-Key. They have really expanded their Marketplace program. I used to have to buy them directly from LSI: it wasn't a big deal to setup an account with them, but it's nice to know that next time I can just piggyback it onto my Digikey order. Although if the delay is a couple weeks I'd have to plan ahead. They typically get them to me in a couple of days.

link
dekhn 810 days ago
So that combines both the quad decoder and the counter?

That would have saved me a chip :) as my project was basically an encoder-driven 8-bit binary counter.

link
HeyLaughingBoy 810 days ago
Yes, I wish it also had differential inputs.

My original design was based on an Arduino Nano with an AtMega328. Originally it was designed to read 0-10-0V position signals. This is from really old machine tools :-)

Processing encoder inputs was a much later change. With the rate of interrupts coming in from a high-resolution encoder turning at 3,000 RPM, there was no way it would keep up and still do all the processing needed.

The product volume wasn't high enough to make it worthwhile moving to a processor that had the timer/counter resources to handle it in hardware, so the simplest solution was adding a $6 chip (and a $2 differential interface chip to handle the differential encoder output channels).

link