|
|
|
|
|
by sircastor
822 days ago
|
|
The reason you can’t game theory a particular cause of action is that you don’t have the appropriate influence, scope of communication, knowledge of those you’re trying to influence, or time to execute. An AGI can build connections faster than you can, exercise surveillance to gain background on targets, operates orders of magnitude faster than you, and can do all these things in multiple, in parallel. The problem is not that you’re somehow dumb, you just don’t have the operating capacity that an AGI would. To over-simplify the model, it’s like asking you personally to compete with a bot-net in sending out spammy emails. The task is not outside the realm of possibility (like violating the 2nd law of thermodynamics), it’s outside the capability of a human. It might be within the realm of capability for a well-organized, well-funded, group of humans (see autocratic propaganda campaigns). The term we often use is “Advanced Persistent Threat” |
|