[toomuchtodo]

This is a lazy take on morality. Neumann enriched himself from wealthy, supposedly sophisticated investors. So sad. He took (not stole, took) from the rich (which they willingly handed over), gave to himself, and walks around free with no criminal prosecution to speak of.

We might disagree on what constitutes “bad people.”

[ethanbond]

Dishonest ones is a good start

[toomuchtodo]

Everyone lies. Context and intent is what matters.

[ethanbond]

Wow… much insight.

How about the ”context” that those investors were investing in his company which had hundreds or thousands of employees who also had stakes in its financial health? And he stole the company’s money from those stakeholders and handed it over to himself personally?

How many degrees in Advanced Moral Gymnastics do you need to figure that one out?

[toomuchtodo]

We just disagree on morality and the subjectivity of truth and human opinion (see Søren Kierkegaard's philosophy writings for more on this), that's all, no gymnastics required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_S%C3%B8ren_Kierk... ("Wikipedia: Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard: Subjectivity")

[ethanbond]

Don't worry, I'm aware that people can have different moral frameworks. I'm also totally comfortable saying that if "lying in order to enrich oneself at the expense of others" is not a solid indicator of "bad person" in your moral framework, then you're an asshole.

Note also that "asshole" has different connotations to different people. And yet... still a very useful descriptor to help isolate bad actors from the rest of society.