[piva00]

> t's easy to become cynical about psychedelics, because there's a ton of bullshit in the space.

And the bullshit stems exactly from it being a potential career death if someone attempted to research them in depth. Without factual and objective analysis the only knowledge left is a hodgepodge of anecdotes, except for the odd Alexander Shulgin or others more scientifically rigorous minded the reports came from users who are not a good cohort of people to objectively analyse their experiences.

MAPS [0] is one of the few groups who against the odds continued to research it, lately they have been advancing research on using MDMA for PTSD, psylocibin, etc. If it wasn't a huge taboo for decades for serious researches to enter the field this type of research would be much more advanced today.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multidisciplinary_Association_...

[epiccoleman]

I totally agree, in case that wasn't clear. I was just responding to the notion in the parent comment that the whole field is nonsense, and that if it weren't nonsense, research would have come out of other countries.

(That notion seems suspect on its face, since those other countries have similarly strict drug laws, but that's not really my point - my point is that there's plenty of research in the field as of 2024, and it's not fair or accurate to dismiss it as nonsense).

[rabbits77]

twenty years of research at a respected institution and still nothing other than hippy fairy tales? sounds about right, thanks for the update.

[epiccoleman]

I don't think there's any reading of my comment (or the extensive modern literature around this subject) where that's a reasonable takeaway.