Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by palata 822 days ago
Sure, but it assumes technology we don't remotely have. Maybe I should not have used the word "theoretically" here. It's just ridiculous to seriously consider it at this point.

It is nice to think about it, of course. But I just don't get how people support wasting so many resources into sending people to Mars where it's basically useless (though exciting, I get it!) and we have much bigger problems to solve on Earth (e.g. the survival of our species in acceptable conditions).

1 comments

I think the word you misused is "impossible," not "theoretically."