|
|
|
|
|
by WaitWaitWha
814 days ago
|
|
This may sound counter intuitive, but I am befuddled with all these static site generators always CLI. Yet, I delight in static sites. Why is are all static site generators (that I am aware of) are CLI? What prevent simplistic drag and drop GUI/WYSIWYG that generates those clean static files? All the static generators I have tested are way over-complicated for the "general public", yet I think static sites are probably the best option for most sites. |
|
Check:
- Tina CMS: https://tina.io/
- Primo CMS: https://primocms.org/
More generally, try looking for `git-based cms` or `CMS+SSG`, you'll find a diverse set of solutions.
Anyway, you had it in reverse. Static generation is the easy part, while what you're looking for is a subset category of CMSs. So you should be looking under the CMS umbrella. You can also setup any generic Headless CMS to trigger generation for a static site. There's not much incentive to build a full fledged CMS, only to clip its wings and limit it to "static site only".