|
|
|
|
|
|
by Arech
819 days ago
|
|
|
That's what I was looking at in the very beginning. Here's how it unfolds:
Grammar page (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-cpp) reference two documents at the very end: - Hyperlinked C++ BNF Grammar (https://alx71hub.github.io/hcb/) - EBNF Syntax: C++ (ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E)) https://www.externsoft.ch/download/cpp-iso.html The second doc has a year in the title, so it's ancient af.
The first one has multiple `C++0x` red marks (whatever that mean, afair that's how C++11 was named before standardization). It mentions `constexpr`, but doesn't know `consteval`, for example. And doesn't even mention any of C++11 attributes, such as [[noreturn]], so despite the "Last updated: 10-Aug-2021", it's likely pre-C++11 and is also ancient af and have no use in a real world. Who might have thought. /s |
|
|