[taneq]

Not in any 2+ dimensional situation. Radar based AEB is awful. Reliable collision avoidance requires robust prediction of future trajectories for everything around you (technically it requires robust lower bounds on minimum time to impact for every object around you, which requires perception of and identification of every object around you plus reasonable predictions based on identification and behaviour history for each object... if you're willing to allow "nah that was BS and not your fault" style collisions like the "stopped for a paper bag sitting on the road" / "hit a stack of bricks in a paper bag" dichotomy then it's a little more forgiving but still much harder than rangefinder + 2nd order equations of motion.)