|
|
|
|
|
by anonymous_i
815 days ago
|
|
Okay developers can't do anything now. Sue is probably not the better description of the thoughts I had. Let's say, can't the developers do anything in an act of retaliation? Given that so much work came from the community. > ... advertised Yeah. Wrong choice of word. Using one kind of license to get the attention of public is in spirit akin to advertising(that was the line of thought I had). I am not doubling down on stupified things I said, I am tryina explain what I thought. So... if I can re-ask the question , I take my dumb-comment yesterday back and ask it like this : can't the community do in act of retaliation against these acts ? can't we mandate community approval for license updates when the community is also participating in contribution and popularizing its usage I do not have anything against Redis. What is going to happen to the future of FOSS and software in general , if once open(open source and Libre) projects end up walled or proprietary etc. |
|