|
|
|
|
|
by drstewart
821 days ago
|
|
>I’m not saying “whatsapp is effectively a monopoly in $country” is great, but it’s better than the US situation. Ah, so it's better to have a monopoly than not have a monopoly? Also, what are your thoughts on the "US situation" given that the US is suing Apple for having a monopoly (literally the headline of the article)? Sounds like the rest of the world. Can I ask why the rest of the world, particularly the EU, which is supposedly so "pro-consumer", isn't breaking up these monopolies held by billion dollar corporations in their countries? |
|
But government most like molasses and sms is decades behind, so tech surpassed such standards. It's not a preferred result but an inevitable one.
>Can I ask why the rest of the world, particularly the EU, which is supposedly so "pro-consumer", isn't breaking up these monopolies held by billion dollar corporations in their countries
Is this rhetorical or have you not in fact heard about the DMA more or less doing the same thing the US is doing here, but years prior?
The big obvious problem here is that an EU country can't just order a US company to disband. And the result of anti-trust to begin with isn't to destroy companies, they want to level the playing field and open the door for more companies to compete properly.