[ghostly_s]

I’m not following what this gives you that Veracrypt's inbuilt hidden+decoy OS feature doesn't already? It seems they require you to manually set up a veracrypt hidden partition for anything to be "hidden" anyway. How is booting your encrypted partition in a VM within Tails more secure than booting it directly?

[paravirtualized]

> How is booting your encrypted partition in a VM within Tails more secure than booting it directly?

There will be no proof of an operating system existing at all, just random data. If you use VeraCrypt along with a hidden partition normally, you would still have the VeraCrypt bootloader or an apparent Windows installation on the drive.

[_boffin_]

After truecrypt 7.1a (I think), the canary vanished. After that, didn’t it become veracrypt? Did they ever add a canary or has there been research in showing it’s not backdoored?

[rOOb85]

While it’s never been officially proven, there is a interesting story behind truecrypt. It was allegedly written by one guy (Paul Le Rou) who was a programmer turned cartel boss/gun/drug runner.

But back to your question, truecrypt was professionally audited and deemed “secure”, some issues were found but none that were back doors or significant. Shortly after(might have even been during) the audit truecrypt deleted all old versions and posted a weird message telling people to use bitlocker.

After some time veracrypt picked up the torch and has continued developing what was truecrypt.

[ratg13]

Wow .. what a crazy story

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Le_Roux

This guy's life definitely needs a movie

[instagib]

I think it said there’s a 447 page book and a few articles. This plus a little probable fiction could be a long tv series.

The possibility of being Satoshi of bitcoin also. Entertaining read. Programmer -> cartel boss.