| If your post is intended to be a remark on how nothing in Go is "revolutionary", please read the first paragraph of my post, and notice how there isn't a single language in your list which is in all 7 categories. Additionally: - Erlang does not implement CSP, it implements Actor model - Java does NOT have all the listed features included in its default toolkit - hence the existence of Gradle, Maven and all other packaging/testing/benchmarking solutions - The "until mid 1990's" is the keyword here - I'm talking about modern languages and I explicitly pointed that out - ACT is not part of any language, it is an external tool that may or may not be reliable, but definitely does not have toolchain/standard library level of quality/stability guarantee. - "Until the repo changes" - packages can disappear from any system, see leftpad incident - "forbids distribution of binary libraries" - not true, see [0] [0] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nr-TQHw_er6GOQRsF6T43GGh... --- However, if I have misread your tone, and your post was intended to be an informative list of languages Go was inspired by, then thanks for the information. But some of it is misleading or false. |
I could go over those points, one by one into detail, including Russ Cox point of view on disabling binary distribution, but not feeling motivated to press the further the wound.