[caminante]

The argument stands.

Forget O&G.

Nobody wants to pay for full electrification, despite having readily available tech. You can't argue the opposite with a straight face.

FWIW, the author conflates CO2 storage as enhanced oil recovery applications only.

[two_handfuls]

The argument says “emissions reduced”, not “full electrification.” And reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.

[caminante]

How much do you want to pay for zero/negative emissions?

[two_handfuls]

reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.

[caminante]

LOL. Don't get offended.

You know that's not my question, and you also know I represented the author accurately (See "forget o&g")