|
|
|
|
|
|
by FrustratedMonky
817 days ago
|
|
|
At least for me, I was responding to those that wanted to call the study biased, or invalidate, or question the results, because the original post was 'classic blogspam'. The study was in Nature, not 'plantbasednews'. Just because a blog with a bias, like 'plantbasednews', reports on a study, doesn't invalidate the study. The 'blog' is just cherry picking the studies that align with their bias. |
|
|