[traceroute66]

> but western Australia has a couple of red ("high interference") cells.

Erm mate, have you tried looking at different days ? Those cells you find so suspicious in Australia are not there on other days !

Seriously, given the largely community-based nature of FR24 data I would not expect too much in term of accuracy.

[lxgr]

> Erm mate, have you tried looking at different days ? Those cells you find so suspicious in Australia are not there on other days !

That kind of disproves the "no data" hypothesis though, no?

One explanation could be they have a simplistic algorithm like "if uncertainty > (something indicating more than 5 minutes of GNSS-to-INS fallback) on more than 50% of all flights of a day", and there's only one flight per day in that region.

> Seriously, given the largely community-based nature of FR24 data I would not expect too much in term of accuracy.

Flightradar24 data is accurate enough for some commercial entities to rely on it. Also, in case of a lack of ADS-B receiver data we'd also expect a grey square, not a red one, right?

[trollian]

I thought it might have been Square Kilometer Array interference but that's to the north of those spots.

[Nition]

If green or "no data" areas randomly turn red sometimes, I'd expect to see them elsewhere in the world sometimes on different days as well. But I've checked every day that's available and I never see them appear in e.g. that big empty space in eastern Russia.

I don't really see any other evidence that low data areas can turn into red areas when there's no actual interference.