Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by __loam 823 days ago
Sure. It's clear this community isn't open to critical views on this topic.
3 comments

1. It’s not just this community

2. It’s not just “critical views” it’s any view that deviates from the velocity or acceleration of the norm

3. Don’t take it personally, votes aren’t about what you said they’re about how the voter feels after having read it

Maybe this community is more open to objective analysis of the articles that are shared, and no so much of passional arguments that benefit no one.
Okay. Objectively, there are several ongoing lawsuits regarding this technology and its use of unlicensed data. Fair use is not as clear cut a case as many here would have you believe, and that's the opinion of many lawyers. Nilay Patel of the verge, who has a law degree, had a conversation about this with another lawyer on his podcast recently and it seems like the legal community is much less hopeful about it than people whose paycheck might rely on this technology.
Or maybe they are just not sure how making things open to everyone can make someone a "dark horse".
Defining dark horse: "a candidate or competitor about whom little is known but who unexpectedly wins or succeeds."

Compared to Altman, Emad Mostaque is a relative nobody and a somewhat controversial figure at the head of what is apparently one of the frontrunners of the AI industry. Additionally, releasing the model, something that was I assume very capital intensive to create, is definitely a bold business strategy, and not one we've seen succeed yet despite the popularity of Stability's models and its derivatives within the open source ai community.