[SV_BubbleTime]

Every Forbes article should have the warning that they are not real publication anymore. Everything they publish is written with an intention that you believe an authors opinion as fact.

The model for Stability ends in a likely way, they will be swallowed up in a payday. We have recent examples of this.

For now, they’re the most open area in a garden of closing gates. And I wish them all the best.

[sp332]

Yup, that’s why the HN code shows the username after the domain now, same as Twitter users.

[PartiallyTyped]

I just noticed. Thanks for this friend. Much appreciated!

[gitfan86]

I was contacted by a Forbes writer for a hit piece, and his pitch on why he wanted to talk to me was clearly a lie.

They feel that they are entitled to be dishonest while writing articles about how CEOs are dishonest.

[gorwell]

*Every legacy media article

[SV_BubbleTime]

No argument from me, but Forbes is special in this regard.

It takes $500 to be a “featured contributor” and they will post whatever nonsense you like. The brand is diluted.

[FergusArgyll]

See Wikipedias guidelines for sources.

(ctrl-f for forbes)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Per...

[iancmceachern]

Indeed.

Articles can be bought outright.