Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by s1artibartfast 813 days ago
I agree with everything you said.

However, it is a very indirect way of getting what the government wants, prone to manipulation.

The more direct option is to contract and purchase the finished product.

The general problem is twofold. First, it can be more financially efficient to spend on incentives then finish product. Second, much of the public do not trust their representatives to perform this analysis and negotiate in good faith.

Is a 25 billion Upstream incentive cheap compared to the Chip Price premium the government would have to pay to have the same incentive?

The other question is who benefits from domestic chips and if the government is the right person to pay.