Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by delichon 821 days ago
Which is a statement about their evaluation of their relative economic prospects in California, where they're headquartered.
2 comments

>Which is a statement about their evaluation of their relative economic prospects in California

How does this have anything to do with California economic prospects? Intel already has operations setup in most of those states for years/decades.

Someone correct me if I am wrong but I always had the impression that a lot of the labor required in these type of plants are technical blue collar work. You need a college degree, the pay is pretty good but most of it is advanced assembly line type of work. I suspect the labor pool in California is difficult.

LA and SF are too expensive both land and labor wise. The valley is all Ag. And SAC is ok but getting more expensive. Ignore other input costs I suspect labor is one of the drivers here since at the end of the day it is assembly line work.

Well, I'm sure it's a lot cheaper to build a new fab in Ohio than CA and the other three states are expansions of existing fabs. In spite of being HQd in CA, Intel doesn't even have a full fab there for whatever combination of reasons.
Does Ohio have the right skills in its labor market though, or will Intel be building from scratch? With the other locations, they already have fans in the area and expanding a workforce is easier than building it from nothing.

Ohio’s labor, land, and water are definitely cheaper. And it’s seismically stable.

I wonder if there is anything to do with ease of shipping there, either by rail or by Great Lakes + Erie Canal or St Lawrence river that make it ideal for Intel

I don't know the skills situation in Ohio although GlobalFoundries has a fab in upstate NY and is building a second one. They need specific skills of course, but they can also pay very well relative to the local market.