[GaggiX]

I like how confident the model is when you provide an anime image, the model always thinks it's AI even though I only provided images created by humans, I don't think I've ever seen a worse AI detector in my life. I hope that this is not a real demo of the product.

[rfrey]

> don't think I've ever seen a worse AI detector in my life. I hope that this is not a real demo of the product.

"I tried it on anime images and it didn't work well on that class" would have been sufficient.

[minimaxir]

That's a distinction only relevant for research, not an actual product.

People can and do use AI detectors on any art style, often to justify harrassment of suspected AI use. In the anime community, it's especially very common to do so.

A bad AI detector is worse than no AI detection at all, so extra scrutiny is justified.

[john_noumenonic]

Wasn't aware of that context in the anime art community, that's good to know about, so thanks. Currently, artist drawn anime images weren't a primary stylistic focus, so the gap makes sense.

[koito17]

Heh, I tried the exact same thing. I uploaded sketches from my favorite artists. Specifically, sketches produced between 2012 and 2016. All of them were identified as AI with greater than 50% probability.

Of course, if one uploads recent sketches, one could be cynical and claim the artist traced over AI-generated image. But I have never seen this done in practice