|
|
|
|
|
|
by grandalf
5142 days ago
|
|
|
It's clear from the screenshots the original author captured that you tried to deny responsibility after you changed the plagiarized content. If he didn't have the screenshots you might have gotten away with it. Since he had the screenshots, your posts all come off as dishonest (which they obviously are). Your attempt to bully the original author on Twitter looks bad too. I think every comment you make is digging a deeper hole for you. Odds are you will be forced to resign over this. |
|
|
http://twitter.com/#!/Zee/status/202124995923681280
> Zee Kane: "he [Mr. Gross] doesn't have screenshots of the whole article…You don't that's pretty sly?"
It is clear this is highly disingenuous argument and a false implication that Mr. Gross's screenshots misrepresent the situation. This is a carefully constructed and extremely dishonest (because it's false) attempt to attack Mr. Gross's credibility, which is blatantly being done in bad faith.
In addition to this attack, elsewhere on this thread here at HN, Mr. Zane, after all this went down and he knows what really happened, accuses Mr. Gross of being a troll:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3972861
> Zee Kane: "Feels like this guy [Mr. Gross] is trolling every single one of us here - myself included - to get a reaction."
This leads one to speculate whether what he then calls an "apology", posted as a bit.ly link at http://bit.ly/JxoWae which then redirects to an obscure Google doc link rather than on his own web site, is sincere.