|
|
|
|
|
by woodruffw
818 days ago
|
|
I agree that the stdlib parser is a mess, but as an observation: replacing one use of it with a (better!) implementation introduces a potential parser differential where one didn’t exist before. I’ve seen this issue crop up multiple times in real Python codebases, where a well-intentioned developer adds a differential by incrementally replacing the old, bad implementation. That’s the perverse nature of “wrong but ubiquitous” parsers: unless you’re confident that your replacement is complete, you can make the situation worse, not better. |
|
And that any 3rd party libs you use also don't ever call the stdlib parser internally because you do not want to debug why a URL works through some code paths but not others.
Turns out that url parsing is a cross-cutting concern like logging where libs should defer to the calling code's implementation but the Python devs couldn't have known that when this module was written.