|
|
|
|
|
by huggyface
5142 days ago
|
|
and your Twitter response was laughably immature to me. That is what put it over the top for me. The astonishingly lazy copying was bad enough, but feeling entitled about it is shocking. Here's the thing -- people linked from sites like TNW report little to no traffic (which, of course, is wholly the intention of sites like TNW -- they don't want the eyeballs leaving). Quite the opposite, in fact, because this blogspam (is it anything but? Was there anything of value added?) steals traffic and linklove that would have gone to the usurped. TNW: Drop the laughable notion that you're doing anyone a favour when you steal their content. It sells to no one. Good content will find its way atop the social news sites quickly, and all you're doing is getting in the way and trying to steal off some of the traffic of other people's work. |
|