|
|
|
|
|
|
by sedev
817 days ago
|
|
|
From the Conclusions section: > The main question we tried to answer is whether a significant shift away from
the US dollar as the dominant “hegemonic” currency is likely to occur in the
foreseeable future, and in which direction the monetary system might develop.
The key conclusion was that the fate of the US dollar as the currency hegemon
depends on a number of factors, with the degree to which US policy makers
would be able to maintain macroeconomic stability relative to other countries
of supreme importance. Only if stability is maintained will the US dollar
retain its position as the safe-haven currency of choice. In heavily hedged terms, they conclude that the situation is currently stable and likely to remain so. My opinion is that there's good information in this document but the editing (mostly in the sense of structure and clarity) is quite poor, prone to using the very real complexity of the issues at hand as an excuse for weasel words, wishy-washiness, and desperation to please one's boss. In reading this document, I recommend that you keep in mind that the document is from late 2022 and Credit Suisse imploded in early 2023, so, as the document's authors might say, one suspects that it does not represent a level of intellectual rigor that one would prefer to see from a globally important bank. |
|
|
What does any of this have to do with "intellectual rigor?" sources are cited in the paper and the authors are among leading global economists. death by association is a cheap way to avoid the real intellectual rigor of refuting legitimate points in the publication.
Political unrest in the US and US over-reliance on sanctions are two of the most damning threats to monetary hegemony in the 21st century. routine defaults on an arbitrary ceiling of debt have precipitously reduced US credit ratings over the past decade. a federal insurrection is also something you might not wish to see in a country that boasts its safe currency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_sanctions
the us sanctions about 26 countries and nearly 2300 people. so https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/sanctions-by-the-n...