|
|
|
|
|
by bee_rider
824 days ago
|
|
I think it is not very generous to interpret somebody suggesting that we try different things, as > Because you are not able to pick and choose what humanity tries out, so shall we stop entirely? I don’t see anything that dictatorial in their suggestion. There’s clearly something wrong in the current LLM based ecosystem. They take gigawatt-hours to train and digest the entire corpus of the internet to produce a model that writes at, what, the level of an erudite college freshman? > not focusing on ever increasing the size of ai models, so that we don't need to build all those power-hungry ai training datacenters? I read the italic bit as not a command to stop, but a suggestion to come up with better algorithms. Which researchers are presumably working on. Hopefully chatGPT & friends don’t suck up all the oxygen. |
|
LLMs are in their infancy and we have individuals calling for reduced usage of electricity along withothers like yourself saying something is wrong with them. I simply believe those are wild opinions to have for a space that is still so new. Either business finds these tools useful in the long run or not and that will drive prices and efficiency.