Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zelphirkalt 829 days ago
I guess I have only seen other dials than the article describes, where the 4 is actually IV. Maybe what the article describes is a regional thing.
1 comments

I learned Roman numbers in school when I was nine. For me being interested in math it was logical that 4 consecutive symbols are against the rules and it needs to be IV.

When I was 14 my grandmother died we got an old clock and it showed IIII. I came to the conclusion it's a poor piece of craftsmanship, the clockmaker just did not know math. Otherwise clocks with Roman numbers were not common at all where I lived.

The old clock is still in my living room over 40 years later (not in a prominent place, I don't find it impressive anymore like I did when I was younger). When reading this I notice that numbers on the lower half are upside down. Had not paid attention to this for over 40 years.