Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by thaumasiotes 831 days ago
> The woman says "no" in the video itself according to her lawyer.

Is that evidence of something? It's common as dirt in professionally-produced porn. What's to catch?
2 comments
nerdponx 831 days ago
The difference is that she is alleging in court that she was not acting.
link
thaumasiotes 831 days ago
That can't be the difference. It's literally impossible - the comment above me is blaming OnlyFans for not catching it.

Not noticing something that isn't yet true is not blameworthy by any standard.

link
verticalscaler 831 days ago
If it requires adjudication from a judge, a process that takes many months or even years, complaining about a false-positive moderation on some website is really neither here nor there.
link
freejazz 831 days ago
That's just as much an assumption going the other day. It's not unusual for the news to report on allegations made in lawsuits.
link
coev 831 days ago
Professionally-produced porn has 2257 consent verification documents for every actor. My guess is that OF and the uploaders do not have those documents from this woman.
link
verticalscaler 831 days ago
Why do you assume that? As you've said down thread, her alleged rapists also allegedly stole her identity and defrauded onlyfans.

Try opening an OF account and see how far you get. Since we are speculating I am guessing something doesn't add up in the article as reported. ;)

link