|
|
|
|
|
|
by mjburgess
823 days ago
|
|
|
No one here disagrees that measurement produces finite information; that is obvious and a necessary --- if it wasnt, we would never be able to know anything. Knowing requires an "early termination". The issue is that there's no evidence this property of measurement is a property of reality, and all the methods, premises, etc. of physics attribute the opposite to reality. Here, it is absolutely necessary for QM to work that the unmeasured state is real-valued,. I'd also say that since measurement is finite in this manner, it then follows large swathes of reality are unknowable.. and this makes it clear why we cannot obtain the latent state of a QM system. |
|
|
You're just doubling down on the premise that a theory founded on a formalism based on unbounded numbers requires unbounded numbers to work. Sure, but why is that necessarily reflective of reality? Why does that entail that no other formalism that doesn't embed infinities / continuity is also not possible? I simply see no reason to accept your conclusion. The infinities you see as essential could very well simply be artifacts of our formalisms.
In fact, I'd conjecture that our continuous formalisms are at the very heart of some core problems in physics [1], and that at least some of those problems can be resolved by exploring more discrete formalisms. I suppose we'll see.
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01421