[defrost]

I'd rather run both in parallel, and I do, as do most of the people here abouts.

No single point of failure, sun heats the water directly and provides power, with a breakout box that accepts power in from the grid (if required), exports excess for points, hopefully that gets better over time, and accepts a local generator input if the PV panels are offline for some reason when there's a local grid power outage.

This is pretty good for now, there's loose neighbourhood discussion about perhaps getting a local area battery in a sea container that can buffer ~200 standard homes to further secure the town's energy stability.

Flexibility, in rural settings, is about having options not a single point of failure | dependency.

Eg: Way up the hill it's good to have PV panels on the bore pumps and better to have these independant of the house circuits with cables in place to route power "in case" .. along with option to use a generator if needed.

[mattclarkdotnet]

Totally agree. I'm in the city so don't have roof space for both. If I could I would totally do it.