[DanyWin]

It could indeed have an impact on jobs, just like any productivity gains have destroyed jobs.

However, the net gains, in my humble opinion, could be phenomenal. Imagine all the time, mental energy and money spent on navigating through the legacy of today's society? From the legacy legal systems that is super complex, to legacy websites, I believe there is much time to be saved so we can dedicate resources to what truly matters, intellectual pursuits or quality time with friends and family

[brailsafe]

> However, the net gains, in my humble opinion, could be phenomenal.

Doesn't seem like a very humble opinion, every time people lose work they need to find income somewhere else or end up working more anyway. Productivity gains equalling more free time has only really ever worked for people who end up or who were already unemployed or self-employed, otherwise it's propaganda spread by people who stand to gain. Even in cases where someone's job became only less manual, it's not like they suddenly got the rest of the day off to spend with their family, they just ended up operating the machine all day anyway, and often getting paid less to do it, to a point where eventually families and friends as a concept started becoming more rare.

[MattGaiser]

> However, the net gains, in my humble opinion, could be phenomenal.

And historically, have always been phenomenal.

If 100 years ago, you told people that only 1.5% of people in USA/Canada would work in agriculture, politicians would have been horrified and in fear of mass unemployment. They would have been similarly horrified if you told them that virtually nobody would work in textile manufacturing in the Western World.

But in reality, the jobs in the former are considered so dismal that they are heavily staffed by desperate people who have no other legal work options and migrant workers from poor countries and jobs in the latter pay so poorly globally that you would be better off running a lemonade stand in a Western country.

We are far better off for the combine harvester freeing us from harvesting wheat by hand. We are far better off for the sewing machine.

[brailsafe]

> We are far better off for the combine harvester freeing us from harvesting wheat by hand. We are far better off for the sewing machine.

Who's "we"? It's not like the people who aren't working with a scythe have moved up to be un-employed computer programmers, they're just picking fruit now.

People who were sewing by hand as a professional don't generally get the afternoon off now to chill with their homies, they just use the sewing machine all damn day.

The only "we" who is better off are consumers and business operators, because they pay less or nothing for that labour. Nobody is talking about the comfy lives of fast fashion makers or the people who assemble our $7000 MacBook pros.

[pjerem]

> Imagine all the time, mental energy and money spent on navigating through the legacy of today's society?

I can see the business perspective for sure. But I really don’t think humanity have the luxury to consume even more energy to run billions of GPUs to do what a programmer team could do and in the meantime having an excuse to not fix its legacy.

That sounds like either totally cyberpunk or very late stage capitalism.

We need to reduce global energy consumption and fix the society as much as we can, not going full throttle in the current direction.