Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mewpmewp2 824 days ago
You could pick a very large number depending on a reasonable processing capability a human has, which represents all the significant physical interactions on a human body over a certain amount of time. Then take the output over a certain amount of time, being all movements of the body.

If you wanted to focus on thoughts alone, you might want to skip few layers/systems, to give input directly to whatever causes thoughts to happen.

All particles and their interactions could also be represented as numbers. But it just depends on what level we do this, and at what level what kind of complex logic is required.

1 comments

Ok so give me some concrete number.
5.1536672454... could be approximated strength for a nervous signal of some sort in a human body in some unit of measurement.