|
|
|
|
|
|
by GlickWick
827 days ago
|
|
|
I think it's a meaningful comparison still. As a human I can comb through tons of prior art to learn my trade, and that's how we learn most of what we know. Yes, an AI requires more, but it's still the same basic idea. I'm still not comfortable with using AI to replace artistic functions in particular for a variety of reasons, but the person you're replying to is definitely within the realm of reason. |
|
|
You create weights to decide which word comes next most probably inside your brain and need to do million of multiplications to say a word?
I think it might not be the same basic idea at all.