[AbrahamParangi]

Man, I am not a pessimist and I am very bullish on AI-the-field but my spidey sense is tingling that this is BS.

- It is written in a way that sacrifices legibility for supposed precision but because the terms used can't really be applied precisely, it's equivalent to spurious digits in a scientific calculation. The usual reason this occurs is to obfuscate or to overawe the audience.

- It is hard to overstate the difficulty of beating semiconductor with a wholly new branch of technology. They're so insanely good. People have been trying to beat them for decades and there's not even a solid theoretical thesis as to how to do so. Even the theoretical advantage of quantum computing is predicated on error correction being scalable which is a totally open question even theoretically.

[liveoneggs]

If room-temperature-stable bio-enhanced AI-specific-computer-powered chatbots don't seem like a realistic goal then maybe you should have clicked "play" on the linked spotify widget.

[015a]

For me its the dichotomy between how absolutely impenetrable the blog post is, combined with the "Set the tone fam, play 'Entropy' by Noizinski on Spotify :)" widget in the bottom right. Like they're trying to check every box on the engagement farming list (something, to be sure, beff jezos is famous for).

Very bad vibes. Hire someone who can communicate, and demonstrate what you're building.